Real estate market study · Issue 01 · September 2026

44% of real estate companies in Miraflores have no working website

We analyzed the 100 real estate companies with a Google Business Profile in Miraflores and measured their digital presence: structure, SEO, speed and ability to capture a client. All with public, verifiable data.

The finding that opens the report

Almost half have nowhere to receive a client

Out of every ten real estate companies in Miraflores, four don't have a website that works. And within that group there's a case that's worse than having none at all.

27No website
17Website down
56Working website
44%No working presence

The 17 with their website down are the uncomfortable finding. They have a web address listed on their Google Business Profile, the client clicks and lands on an error. That's worse than having no website: the listing promises something that doesn't exist, and that first impression goes to the competition.

Before the numbers

It's not one sector, it's two different businesses

Mixing those who build with those who broker skews any average. We split the 32 websites analyzed into two groups and measured them separately.

IndicatorDevelopers (n=14)Brokerages (n=18)Average score74%56%Mentions the district36%0%Has an H164%33%Structured data71%39%Page per project79%39%Blog64%44%Server response2330 ms926 ms

Each group fails at the opposite thing. Developers have the content and the structure, and a server that takes twice as long. Brokerages respond fast and have almost nothing to index.

They're two different problems, and that's why they take different work to fix.

Local search

Zero of 18 brokerages mention Miraflores in their title

Real estate search is local: people type the district. Brokerages live off that search, and none of them is working it in the place where it matters most.

0%Brokerages that name the district
36%Developers that name it
67%Brokerages with no H1 at all
39%Brokerages with structured data

The title is the blue line Google shows in the results. If it doesn't name the district, the page competes against the whole country instead of against the block next door.

It's an afternoon's work and doesn't require rebuilding anything.

Structure

Half pile all their projects onto a single page

If projects don't have their own URL, none of them can rank for its name. Whoever searches for a specific project never gets there, and the portal takes the click.

79%Developers with a page per project
39%Brokerages with a page per property
64%Developers with a blog
93%With a form or WhatsApp

The ones that do split by project can compete on the building's name, the area and the unit type. The rest only compete with their homepage, against portals that have thousands of pages.

Speed

The ones with the best content are the slowest

We didn't measure the PageSpeed score but its causes, which anyone can check: how long the server takes to respond and how much the page weighs.

2330 msServer, developers
926 msServer, brokerages
50%Developers in the red
39%Brokerages in the red

The data reads the opposite of how it looks. Developers' pages weigh less, and even so their server takes 2330 ms versus 926 ms. If weight were the problem, they'd weigh more. Weighing less and taking longer, the bottleneck is the hosting: shared hosting with no caching.

A caution about the sample: it's 14 and 18 websites. At that size the data points the way, it doesn't prove anything.

Ranking · Developers

The 10 best-prepared developers in Miraflores

The ones that meet the most of the ten indicators we measured. We publish their names because the credit is theirs, and anyone can check the data by visiting their website.

01
Quatro Inmobiliariaquatroinmobiliaria.pe
90%
02
Tale Inmobiliariataleinmobiliaria.com
90%
03
Abril Grupo Inmobiliarioabril.pe
90%
04
Soho Inmobiliariasoho.pe(the Google Business Profile points to zuma.pe, which redirects)
90%
05
Inmobiliaria Edificaedifica.com.pe
80%
06
Los Portaleslosportalesdepas.com.pe(apartments website; the corporate site is losportales.com.pe)
80%
07
V&V Grupo Inmobiliariovyv.pe
80%
08
Grupo Gobesagrupogobesa.com
70%
09
Casa y Gestióncasaygestion.com
70%
10
Aurora Grupo Inmobiliariogrupoaurora.pe
70%

None reaches 100%. The top score is 90%, and 11 of 14 developers reach 70%. The group average is 74%.

Ranking · Brokerages

The 5 best-prepared brokerages

Same index, different group. We list five because this group starts lower: the top brokerage scores 80%, below the first four developers.

01
Lima Corretaje SAClimacorretaje.com
80%
02
Alinea Inmobiliariaalinea.com.pe
80%
03
Inmobiliaria Efectimaxefectimaxinmobiliaria.com
70%
04
Hd Corp Grupo Inmobiliariohdcorpgrupoinmobiliario.com
70%

For the rest of the sample we publish only aggregate data. The goal is to portray the state of the sector, not to single anyone out.

What we didn't find

Good reviews don't mean a well-kept website

We cross-referenced Google reputation with website quality, expecting a relationship. There isn't one.

The companies with the most reviews score practically the same as those with the fewest on every indicator: mentioning the district, having a page per project, tracking conversions or having a blog.

And the ones that not have a website don't make up for it with reputation either: their median review count and their rating are on par with everyone else's.

The takeaway: local reputation and web presence are two separate assets. Being loved by your clients doesn't make you visible to the ones who don't know you yet.

How it was done

Methodology

We publish the full method so anyone can replicate it or challenge it. If a number can't be rebuilt from here, it doesn't belong.

From 100 listings to 32 websites analyzed

The universe is the 100 real estate companies with a Google Business Profile in Miraflores, collected in August 2026. From there, we subtracted in this order:

StepSubtractRemainingWhyGoogle Business Profiles in Miraflores100100—No published website-2773the listing has no web addressWebsite down-1756the domain doesn't respond or returns an errorPortals and aggregators-947Properati, Linktree and the like: they're nobody's websiteDuplicate listings from the same company-740several publish one listing per project, all pointing to the same domainCompanies that don't sell property-535consultancies, appraisers and an individual selling their apartmentWebsites that can't be measured-332they render with JavaScript: the initial HTML arrives empty and everything would come out as zero

The percentages aren't all calculated on the same base, and it's worth knowing that. The ones in the first block (no website, website down) are based on the 100 listings, because the question is how many real estate companies in the district have a presence. All the others are based on the 32 websites analyzed, or on their group, because only websites that exist and respond can be measured.

The index: ten indicators, no weights

Each indicator is worth 1 if met and 0 if not. A website's score is how many it meets out of ten: 90% means nine out of ten, not a weighted grade.

IndicatorMet whenWhat problem it revealsDistrict in the titlethe title says Miraflores or Limacompetes against the whole country instead of against its own blockMeta descriptionit exists and isn't emptyGoogle makes up the result textH1there's at least one H1the page doesn't state what it's aboutStructured datathere's JSON-LDit can't show up with price, photo or ratingPage per projecteach project has its own URLno project ranks for its nameBlogthere's an articles sectionit doesn't capture people who aren't searching by brand yetForm or WhatsAppthere's at least onethe visitor arrives and has nowhere to leave their detailsTrackingthere's GA4, GTM or a pixelyou can't tell what worksPerformanceserver under 800 ms, page under 1500 kb and at most 2 render-blocking scriptsthe visitor leaves before seeing anythingOwn domainit's not Wix, Google Sites, GoDaddy or Linktreeany authority it earns belongs to the provider

Two notes on how to read the index. The contact indicator is a or: having only WhatsApp scores the same as having a full funnel. And none of them measures quality, only presence: a poorly written H1 scores the same as a good one.

That's why the index is useful for spotting gaps, not for saying who sells more.

How each thing is measured

The measurement. One HTTP request to the public homepage, without logging in or using any paid API. From the HTML we read the title, the meta description, the headings, the JSON-LD, the internal links, the forms and the tracking tags.

Performance. We don't use the PageSpeed score, which requires a paid API and oversimplifies. We measure its two verifiable causes: the time the server takes to return the first byte, and the weight of the homepage plus its resources.

The two groups. A developer is one that builds and sells its own projects (14); a brokerage is one that brokers third-party properties (18). The category Google assigns is no use for this: it calls one developer “Fabricante de edificios portátiles” (portable building manufacturer) and another “Agencia inmobiliaria” (real estate agency). We classify by what the website shows and review case by case.

The ranking. Websites hosted on borrowed domains are excluded: we can't reward anyone for a domain that isn't theirs.

What it doesn't measure. It doesn't measure sales, leads, design quality or ad spend. A real estate company can be invisible in organic search and fill its projects with ads.

Want to know how yours is doing?

We apply exactly this measurement to your website and tell you what to fix first, in order of impact. It's a 30-minute consultation, no strings attached.

Book a review
Send message